About Me

Name: Bob Wood aka...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Obama Will Only Raise Taxes On Those Making ...

Obama Will Only Raise Taxes On Those Making
$250k, $200k, $150k, $120k, $70k, $60k, $50k, $40k
Ah, What the Hell? On Everyone!
 
Watch this before you vote!
 
 
 
 
It's about time the RNC went on the attack!
 
As usual, I welcome your comments and debate...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Sensible Campaign Platform

"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC
Balance the budget.  That should be easy.  Figure out what your income is, then prioritize your expenditures, subtract the expenditures from the income until you get to zero, and eliminate EVERYTHING that falls below zero.  We all learned how to do this in high school.  And if we didn't learn it there, we certainly learned it soon after setting up housekeeping on our own.  This is Dave Ramsey 101.
 
Public debt should be reduced.  That should be one of the priorities in balancing the budget.  I don't know about you, but my parents taught me that if you don't have the cash to pay for it, you don't need it!  That is true for governments as well.  We can not in good conscience continue to pile debt onto the backs of our children.
 
The Treasury should be refilled.  You and I have savings accounts, CD's, and long-term investments.  We call it "Saving for a rainy day."  Well, recent history shows that the federal government has rainy days too.  And when it has a rainy day, it's a doozy!  In fact, almost everything into which governemnt inserts itself results in the unintended consequence of a rainy day!
 
The arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled.  Our public officials have forgotten that they are elected by us - ordinary citizens - to serve us.  In their first official act, taking the oath of office, they pledge to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of The United States of America."  But judging from the legislation and court decisions they thrust upon us, it becomes painfully obvious that most of these folks have never read, much less understood, The Constitution.  Instead, they look forward to the next election as if they are entitled to hold the office instead of using the office to serve the people who put them there.
 
The assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome (the United States) become bankrupt.  We spend billions of dollars in foreign aid every year, sending it to countries that don't even like us very much.  In many cases, those American dollars never reach the people of those lands for their benefit, and instead those funds end up being embezzled by the corrupt leaders of those lands.  Our government has no mechanism for correcting this misspent "charity."  And now we have a presidential candidate who wants us to "give" 1% of our Gross Domestic Product to third-world countries and have it administered by the United Nations!  That is dumber than dumb!  Charity begins at home, and that means your home and my home, not the government.
 
People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.  Every year at Thanksgiving, Rush Limbaugh tells the story of The Mayflower Compact.  Most of us have forgotten that socialism was tried in this country before it WAS a country, and it failed miserably.  The people who lived under that Compact dumped it for a better way.  The New Deal and The Great Society have thrown hundreds of billions of dollars into government programs that have done nothing more than create another generation of the "dependent class" - those who would rather sit on their butts doing nothing until the government hands them a check (and I am not referring to those who paid Social Security and Medicare premiums for years.)  See this article "Cory the Well Driller’s Letter to Obama the Socialist" at The Texas Rainmaker.  We need more "Cory, The Well-Drillers," "Joe, The Plumbers," and anyone else who dares to start and operate the small businesses that provide the vast majority of the jobs in this country.  And we need the workers who will show up and work a full day for a day's pay.  And government needs to get out of the way and watch as the miracle of the Free Enterprise System that made this country great does its magic.
 
Cicero was right more than 2000 years ago.
 
Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Army Specialist Explains The Election

I'll let Army Spc. Joe Cook explain things for you.
(This is currently the #1 video on YouTube!!)
{Special thanks to Jackpine Savage at FunDMental Politics!  He has some interesting and fun things to say about this election...}



As always comments are welcome and debate is encouraged.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Can Obama Take the Oath of Office?

Occasionally I encounter a writer I have never read before, and I find that he or she has something really worthwhile to say.  Such a writer is Laura Hirschfeld Hollis in her TownHall article, A President Who Won't Uphold the Constitution? Never.  I must have been traveling in the wrong circles or leading a very sheltered life.  I commend her entire article to your reading.
 
Most of us have heard the fractured logic that Senator Barack Obama used to explain why he would not be wearing the American Flag on his lapel.  We saw the pictures of the Democrat candidates on an outdoor stage, hands over their hearts during the performance of the National Anthem.  That is, all were saluting except Senator Obama.  During Obama's Excellent European Adventure and Middle East Tour, he had plenty of time for everything except visiting wounded American soldiers when he discovered that he could not use them for a photo-op.  But he made time to play basketball.  From these events, we have a superficial picture of his beliefs about his and our country.  More on that below.
 
We have learned that he has had lengthy relationships with shady characters after explaining those relationships as "choosing my friends very carefully" in his autobiography (which was apparently ghost-written by William Ayers.)  In the final weeks of his campaign, he tells us these people are not "advisors, or associated with his campaign in any way, and will not be a part of my administration."  And we heard him try to explain away his association with ACORN as inconsequential, when just months before he promised ACORN that they would meet with him during the transition months between his election and inauguration.  And he said that ACORN would have a significant role in shaping his policies.  From these associations we gain a pretty good indication of his character by the friends he chooses.
 
This is all well-documented in the smaller area of the media reserved for conservatives, talk radio, and the blogosphere.
 
A man is known by the company he keeps.  In his 1995 'memoir' "Dreams From My Father," Obama wrote:
To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. [pages 99-100]
Obama chose William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, unrepentant terrorist bombers.  Ayers hired him to chair the Chicago Annenburg Challenge when he was fresh out of law school, and they served together as Directors of the Woods Fund.  He chose Tony Rezko, now a convicted felon, who provided campaign cash and worked a cushy real estate deal to get the Obama's a $1.6 million home, plus additional adjacent real estate.  He chose Rashid Khalidi, a spokesman for the Palestine Liberation Organization, whose views are not in the best interests of Israel, the most reliable ally we have in the Middle East.  He chose Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whose bigoted, racist rants Obama never heard in twenty years of attending church "maybe twice a month."  Wright was (is?) his spiritual mentor and advisor.  And he chose Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson, who drove Fannie Mae into the ground and walked away with tens of millions of dollars in bonuses for doing so, and now they are key advisors to his campaign.  And ACORN...  Well, John Fund of the Wall Street Journal was all over television Wednesday proclaiming that he is working a BIG negative story with a whistleblower (with documents) that will confirm that the FBI investigations currently under way are no witch hunt.  There is a long history of Obama-ACORN connections.
 
This should be enough to call Obama's judgment into question, but the LSM (LameStream Media) has not seen fit to even publicize these relationships.  And his policies would be just as questionable, and there will be more on that in a later article.
 
 Laura Hollis hits a bulls-eye on Obama's view of the Constitution.  She writes:

The Drudge Report and other legitimate investigative sources like the National Review, have exposed the most damning evidence yet of Barack Obama’s utter disregard for the core principles of the United States government.  In a radio interview given in 2001, Obama reveals yet again about what he means by ‘equality,’ when he says, “…the Supreme Court never entered into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.”

 Our Constitution gives the Supreme Court no authority over redistribution of wealth, or political and economic justice.  But Obama laments the fact that the Supremes under Earl Warren “didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution.”  Can you guess what kind of judges and justices he will appoint to the various courts?  Of course, he will be seeking jurists who are not afraid to ignore the "Supreme Law of the Land" in favor of his dream of what the United States should be.
 
Hollis continues:

At this point, any belief in Obama’s respect for constitutional limits is delusional.  If he is so cavalier about the Constitution’s limits upon the power of the judiciary, why on earth would he respect the limits on the power of the Presidency?  Or on Congress?  ...These views are why Obama’s acquaintances, associates and allies matter.  Why his Alinskyite “by any means necessary” philosophy matters.  Why we should care that he funds and takes money from people who say they hate or wish to undermine America.  Why we should be concerned when he took spiritual sustenance from a man who spends much of his time condemning white people.  This is what drives Barack Obama.  And this is why he wants the Presidency.

The rest of Obama’s observations during this interview are just as asinine, and just as threatening.  He says, “generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: [It] says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.”

"A charter of negative liberties?"  What bull!  The Constitution very deliberately defines the structure and powers of the federal government, and then it reserves all other rights to the states and the people.  The Founding Fathers wrote it for (apparently) a much more self-sufficient people than the senator believes we are today.  Obama seems to believe that we can not provide for our own lives, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  Although the United States Constitution represents the longest surviving government on the planet today, it just does not conform to Obama's vision.  And we know very little if anything from his campaign speeches about what The Chosen One thinks that government MUST do for us once you get past "universal healthcare."  Hollis says that it boils down to what Democratic Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur in Ohio earlier this week, who said that Americans “needed a Second Bill of Rights guaranteeing all Americans a job, health care, homes, an education, and a fair playing field for business and farmers.”  The Founders would roll over in their graves to see what we have become.
 
Since Obama has so much disdain for The Constitution and that - in his mind - it fails to do what it should, how can he possibly swear to preserve, protect and defend it?  I suppose that oath of office will be to Obama as he has said, "Words!  Just words!"
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It Doesn't Have To Happen!

Here is your daily reminder.
 
 
 
 
As always, I welcome your comments and debate...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Democratic "Vision"

They sure are a cocky bunch, aren't they?  Oh, how I would love to see an "I told you so!" moment on November 5, and if the Republicans had the foresight to launch another "Contract With America" it could have happened.  As it is, the Democrats are acting as though the election is merely a formality on the way to their coronation in January.  And they are so full of themselves, they are convinced that they are going to win the Presidency and increase their ranks in both the House and Senate.  Or... they are merely trying to convince the rest of us.
 
And it may be.  But there is certainly no time like the present to visit some of the reasons that we should never let it happen.  And those reasons come from their own words (here's the "cocky" part.)
 
As reported on SouthCoastToday.com, Rep. Barney Frank, D-MA, of "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have no problems" fame, lays out the agenda of the Democrats.
 

NEW BEDFORD — After the November election, Democrats will push for a second economic stimulus package that includes money for the states' stalled infrastructure projects, along with help paying for healthcare expenses, food stamps and extended unemployment benefits, U.S. Rep. Barney Frank said Thursday.

In a meeting with the editorial board of The Standard-Times, Rep. Frank, D-Mass., also called for a 25 percent cut in military spending, saying the Pentagon has to start choosing from its many weapons programs, and that upper-income taxpayers are going to see an increase in what they are asked to pay.

The military cuts also mean getting out of Iraq sooner, he said.
Infrastructure projects?  Paying healthcare expenses?  Food stamps?  Extended unemployment benefits?    Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, Sen. Harry Reid, D-NV, and Sen. Barack Obama, D-IL, and their surrogates have all been telling us about the "failed policies of the last eight years."  I presume that means the increased deficit spending in a $3 trillion annual budget.  More government spending is just what we need!  And there is no mention of the almost $1 trillion that The Chosen One is proposing.  And it does not include the $850 billion we just threw at Fannie and Freddie.  So now we're up to almost $5 trillion before Barney's plan gets passed.  But isn't that what got us into this mess in the first place?
 
A 25% cut in military spending?  At a time when the Islamic fascist terrorists want nothing more than a repeat of their devastation of September 11, 2001, and our southern border is being overrun by illegal alliens bent on retaking the southwest United States for Mexico, would it be such a good idea to CUT our military strength?  We did that during the Carter administration, and we got the Iran Hostage crisis.  We tried it again under Clinton, and we got the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, embassy bombings, the Khobar Towers, the USS Cole, and the 2001 WTC fiasco.  Now might not be a good time to cut the military, especially in light of Democrat VP Nominee Joe Biden's warnings a week ago to mark my words, within six months, the world will test this young, inexperienced president if Sen. Obama and I are elected.
 
And Frank says we will leave Iraq sooner, leaving a struggling Iraqi government to defend itself against not only al Qaeda in Iraq but also against beligerent neighbors like Iran and Syria before it is strong enough to do so.
 
Finally, Frank says, "...upper-income taxpayers are going to see an increase in what they are asked to pay."  Asked?  I don't think so.  We already know that the Bush tax cuts were across the board cuts applied to all taxpayers equally, and revenue to the government increased.  Yet those cuts have been vilified by the Democrats as "tax cuts for the rich."  Remember that when they expire in 2010, and the Democrats have not reauthorized them.  When your take-home pay goes down, don't blame your employer; blame the Democrats in Congress.
 
"Asked" implies a choice, but after the November 4th Election Day, we will not have a choice.  If the Democrats have their way, the force of law - no matter how just or unjust - will force the "evil rich" to pay for their schemes.  And you may be be surprised to find out that the "evil rich" goes a lot lower than the $250,000 minimum that The Messiah says he will soak.
 
The Republicans - especially those in Congress - should have their heads examined for allowing the likes of Pelosi, Reid, Frank, and Obama to frame the debate this year.  The "do-nothing" Democrat Congress of the last two years was ripe for picking, and our friends in the GOP sat on their hands.
 
This year as in no previous election year, it is up to us, the electorate, to drag the Republicans at all levels to victory.  Then for the next two years, we must hold their feet to the fire to serve us rather than to make us their servants.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey, Congress! Welcome to the REAL world!

Recently Congress closed the House Cafeteria and reopened it under the control of a private contractor.  Now comes the headline from TheHill.com:  Staffers protest cafeteria price hikes

Quote:
Jeff Ventura, spokesman for the CAO (Chief Administrative Office, which oversees the House eatery vendor, Restaurant Associates), said the price hike reflects the same increase families throughout the country are enduring during these hard economic times.

“This is not the school lunch program,” Ventura said. “I think American taxpayers would find it deeply troubling that, in this economy, a small group of Hill staffers feel they are entitled to receive a special, taxpayer-subsidized exemption from the food price increases every hardworking American family is now struggling with.”

What a bunch of cry-babies! Let 'em give up their cushy gubmint jobs and go find a real job in the private sector.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shame on McCain and Palin?

From Lewis Diuguid, Kansas City Star Editorial Page columnist:

Shame on McCain and Palin for using an old code word for black


Quote:
The "socialist" label that Sen. John McCain and his GOP presidential running mate Sarah Palin are trying to attach to Sen. Barack Obama actually has long and very ugly historical roots.

J. Edgar Hoover, director of the FBI from 1924 to 1972, used the term liberally to describe African Americans who spent their lives fighting for equality.
...
McCain and Palin have simply reached back in history to use an old code word for black. It set whites apart from those deemed unAmerican and those who could not be trusted during the communism scare.

Shame on McCain and Palin.

Are you freakin' kidding me?
 
Shame on the Kansas City Star for hiring a moron to its editorial board.

Lessee now: We can't say black, African-American, racist, socialist, Hussein, skinny, community organizer, or inexperienced when we talk about Obama. We can't talk about his long-time associations with Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, Tony Rezko, and ACORN or we are racists. We can't say anything about his wife's "For the first time, I'm proud..." or other comments even though she's on the trail acting as a surrogate. What does that leave?

Oh, yeah! His legislative record. But we can't talk about his support of infanticide or NARAL. We can't talk about his "spread the wealth around" policy, or his income tax cuts for 95% (even though 40% don't pay income taxes.) We can't talk about his cut-and-run policy in Iraq or his lack of a policy to defeat Islamic terrorism. And we certainly can not mention this inconvenient truth, reported in The Wall Street Journal:
(W)ho knew that Senator Barack Obama was the largest single recipient of Fannie Mae campaign contributions over the last 20 years, save for Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd? More amazing still, Mr. Obama pulled off this feat even though he had only been in the Senate for four of those 20 years.
(Of course, he didn't report for Senate duty until January 2005, so it has been LESS THAN four years.)
 
If we can't talk about any of this during the campaign, can you imagine what it will be like for the next four years if this nobody becomes President? Every time we disagree with one of his moronic policies, we are going to be called racists or rednecks.

Sheesh!

It's gonna be a lo-o-o-o-ng four years... But he hasn't won yet!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Record versus Rhetoric

Dr. Thomas Sowell has written an excellent analysis of the election in Record versus Rhetoric for Jewish World Review.  I can't help myself; I must add commentary, even though Dr. Sowell needs no help from me!
Dr. Sowell wrote:
Apparently there is something about Sarah Palin that causes some people to think of her as either the best of candidates or the worst of candidates. She draws enthusiastic crowds and provokes visceral hostility in the media.

Which explains one of the major reasons that newspaper circulations and network broadcast ratings are down. The media are disconnected from the people they are supposed to be serving. Instead, they would prefer to TELL US WHAT TO THINK, as the companies for which they work continue to dwindle.

Dr. Sowell wrote:
The issue that is raised most often is her relative lack of experience and the fact that she would be "a heartbeat away from the presidency" if Senator John McCain were elected. But Barack Obama has even less experience — none in an executive capacity — and his would itself be the heartbeat of the presidency if he were elected.

Everyday people like us understand this a lot better than the "enlightened" media crowd.  In fact, Gov. Sarah Palin has more executive experience than the other three candidates combined!  Unfortunately, the media are too dumb to realize that we recognize what they are trying to do.

Dr. Sowell wrote:
Whatever the shortcomings of John McCain and Sarah Palin, they are people whose values are the values of this nation, whose loyalty and dedication to this country's fundamental institutions are beyond question because they have not spent decades working with people who hate America.

Therein lies the tale. Most of us, regardless of the daily challenges we face, lead a pretty good life as a result of the incomparable opportunity that is America. We don't mope around all day whining, "Woe is me. When is the government going to fix my miserable life?"

We get up everyday, go to work at a job we are thankful to have that makes it possible for us to meet our obligations, and we dream of ways to improve our lot in life. Then we make plans for achieving those dreams, and we embark on a course of action to make it happen.

We just wish that government would get out of our way and not steal a little more from us every time we see a bit of improvement. I will never forget my first pay-raise as a relatively new employee of the local power company many years ago. I took home less money as a result of the higher tax bracket into which it threw me. That is just wrong!

But tens of millions of us perservere every day.

Dr. Sowell wrote:
Nor are (McCain and Palin) people whose judgments have been proved wrong consistently during decades of Beltway "experience."

But their opponents have been - time and again.  And Dr. Sowell has the facts to prove it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Polls and The Media

Journalists - including those in broadcasting - have forgotten that their job is to observe what happened and report on it through their employers medium.

All of the polls that you and I see have been commissioned by the media (as in Fox News/Opinion Dynamics, CNN/Gallup, etc.) and then reported AS news. The media is now in the business of blatantly creating the news that they report. And the dumb masses eat it up as if it were gospel.

If Obama were so far ahead as the talking heads would have us believe, then why is he campaigning so hard in Virginia where he reportedly has a 10-point lead in the polls? His internal polling must be telling him something different.

And don't forget that there is a difference between registered voters, likely voters, and actual voters on election day. There can be a very BIG difference, and the last one is the only one that makes any difference.

So, don't let anything stand in the way of voting in spite of what the media tell us.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Biden: World will test Obama

Does he really want to get elected Vice-president? 

When you read his comments, you have to wonder what Senator Joe Biden's thought processes are.

Biden to Supporters: "Gird Your Loins", For the Next President "It's Like Cleaning Augean Stables"


Quote:
"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."

He will be tested. I wonder why? Could it be because our enemies know he is weak?  How nice!  Another Jimmy Carter. I guess we get to hoist the white flags early this time.

If Obama can't handle the job, elect McCain who can handle it. Simple.
 
In a separate report, ABC News' Matt Jaffe reports:

Quote:
"It's totally within our wheelhouse. We can do this," Biden said confidently of the Democratic ticket's chances, before adding a note of caution. "But anybody who thinks that we're going to be elected, and all of a sudden, you know, the birds are going to start chirping and everything is going to come out is wrong."

At the Atherton home of former state comptroller Steve Westly, who made an unsuccessful bid for California governor two years ago, Biden joked with the audience about being the fourth most senior senator, but still being younger than 39 of his fellow lawmakers.

"I am getting so tired of this, I am the senior guy on the ticket. I can't stand it man," said the 65-year-old Biden, who then downplayed the veep slot to a member of the audience. "If I had known it was gonna get this way, John, I would have never left Senate chairmanship of the Foreign Relations Committee. You know, the vice presidency ain't much to begin with, you know what I mean?"

It sure doesn't sound like Biden wants to win.  And if he has such little regard for the office for which he is running, should he be rewarded with election to it?

BTW, you did know he is simultaneously running for re-election to the Senate, didn't you?


Biden makes 1988 Dan Quayle look like an amateur at this stuff!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Joe the Plumber and Robin Hood (Update)

(Update Below)
 
A lot has been said over the last few days about Joe the Plumber.  His real name is Joe Wurzelbacher from Toledo, Ohio.  He has become something of an instant celebrity because of this question to Sen. Barack Obama:
 
Obama sees nothing whatever wrong with taking Joe's hard-earned money - and the rest of us, as well - and giving it to someone else that he deems "less fortunate."  Well, why are they less fortunate?  Could it be that they have not made as wise choices as Joe, such as learning to do a job well, and getting up every day and going to work?  Could it be that the "less fortunate" squandered more than one opportunity at an education or an entry-level job to gain experience?  Could it be that the "less fortunate" are waiting for someone - even government - to put it in their hands for them? 
 
Joe obviously set some goals for himself and worked to attain them.  And now comes The Chosen One with a plan to take it away as soon as he has it within his grasp.  Neal Cavuto followed up for more of Joe's thoughts.
 
Wurzelbacher only made one misstatement to Cavuto.  Robin Hood did not steal from the "evil" rich to give to the poor.  Robin Hood stole from the evil Sheriff of Nottingham (the government) who had stolen his wealth from the poor citizens, and gave it back to the people who had originally earned it.
 
Robin Hood and Joe Wurzelbacher are my heroes.
 
Meanwhile, the Lamestream Media is probably trying to dig up dirt on Joe.  We would be much better served if the media spent half of that time and effort trying to dig up Barack Obama's history.  But we already know all we really need to know.  Obama himself said it:  "We need to spread (your) wealth around, and everybody benefits."  That is socialism, and we already have too much of that as it is.
 
UPDATE:  Well, this didn't take long.  Carrie Budoff Brown, Amie Parnes, Ben Smith, and Jonathon Martin of Politico busily got after the story, including information they got from the Associated Press, and now reports.  And what did they learn?
Wurzelbacher acknowledged to reporters that he doesn't have a plumber's license, but said he didn't need one because he works for someone else at a company that does residential work. State and local records show Wurzelbacher has no license, although his employer does.David Golis, manager and residential building official for the Toledo Division of Building Inspection, said Wurzelbacher still would need to be a licensed apprentice or journeyman to work in Toledo.

Wurzelbacher also owes the state of Ohio $1,182.98 in personal income tax, according to Lucas County Court of Common Pleas records. The Ohio Department of Taxation filed a claim on his property until he pays the debt, according to the records. The lien remains active.
And the McCain campaign says:
“It's an outrage that the Obama campaign and the media are attacking Joe the Plumber for asking a legitimate question of a presidential candidate. This is why voters still have so many questions about Barack Obama. Instead of answering tough questions, his campaign attacks average Americans for daring to look at the reality behind his words, said Tucker Bounds, spokesman the McCain-Palin campaign. “John McCain will continue to fight on behalf of all hardworking Americans like Joe for policies geared toward increasing prosperity and reducing the burden on taxpayers -- not 'spreading the wealth around' for Senator Government to distribute as he sees fit.”
If Politico can spare four writers in conjunction with the might of the AP, maybe they can look into another story that cries out for attention after two years.  Do you suppose they could just get after the Obama background mysteries with the same sense of "responsibility" they exhibited in trying to destroy the reputation of an everyday citizen in the name of partisan politics.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Brokaw: 'Democrats Are About to Reclaim Their Power'

Newsbusters documents this unbelievable quote from a former network anchor and moderator of the second Presidential Debate.  On Monday's "Today" show, we find Tom Brokaw saying 'Democrats Are About to Reclaim Their Power'.

This all reminds me of 1968, when after having the Democrats in control since 1932, the Republicans then took over in 1968 and effectively, they have had a grip on this country politically since that time, for 40 years now. It looks like we're in for a big turn of the wheel. That the Democrats are about to reclaim their power, because the McCain campaign is dysfunctional, to put it bluntly, and that's, those are the words of Bill Kristol and a lot of other people. They can't quite decide who they are, whether the McCain mavericks or the Bush Republicans or the neo-cons.
That sounds totally unbiased to me.  Fair and balanced NBC!

Where does Brokaw get the idea that Republicans "took over in 1968"  and have had a "grip on this country politically for 40 years"?  Does he not remember Carter (1976-1980) and Clinton (1993-2000)?  I guess it does not matter that both houses of Congress were controlled by Democrats until 1995 with only brief interludes with a Republican Senate?  And now they have both Houses again, and have accomplished nothing in the last two years.

His statement only reinforces that the liberal Democrats consider majority power in both elected branches of our government as their birthright.  And Brokaw has sold his journalistic soul for the perpetuation of that lie.

Winning elections is not a "birthright."  To win an election, one must earn victory.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. gasoline price marks biggest drop ever

U.S. gasoline price marks biggest drop ever

Quote:
On Friday, fears of a global recession helped drive down U.S. crude oil futures prices more than 10 percent to the lowest settlement since September 2007. U.S. crude for November delivery CLX8 settled on Friday at $77.70 a barrel, down $8.89, or 10.27 percent, on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Do you suppose that Congress allowing expiration of the ban on domestic off-shore drilling had any effect? And we haven't sunk a single new well yet!

But at least now we can!

I wonder if the administration has approved any new leases for off-shore exploration and drilling yet...
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's Not Over Yet!

Victor Davis Hanson says so in this article

He points out this is a Democratic year, but we knew that because that is all we have heard from the media throughout the campaign.  President George W. Bush is very unpopular, we are told.  Even some of the conservative pundits that we have all known and loved for many years have been so preposterous as to suggest that Alaska's Gov. Sarah Palin is unfit to assume the Presidency.  The stock market is in the tank, and the federal government has taken over large chunks of the real estate and insurance industries and is making noises about tkaing over the banking industry.  All of this in violation of the United States Constitution.
 
In spite of all of this, Barack Obama has been unable to close the deal!  He was barely able to win his party's nomination as he continuously lost ground to Hillary Clinton in the final months.  He was simply able to run out the clock, protecting a lead he built in the early primary and caucus states.
 
You would think that the polls should be showing him with very respectable double-digit leads over McCain.  In spite of the fact that various polling units always seem to oversample potential Democrat voters, the polls still show the race within striking distance for McCain.  There are, as Dr. Hanson points out, several reasons the race is not over.
 
The economy is "in dire straits" to hear the media tell it, and our willing populace believes that the sky is falling.  Just one week ago, Congress passed and the President signed into law the pork-laden bailout bill to "save Wall Street at the expense of Main Street."  Wall Street responded like it was a bailout, didn't it?  The Dow dropped 18% of its value.  Apparently, Wall Street was not impressed.  Investors may have seen the "bailout" as a way for government to take even more control over the free enterprise system, which it was.
 
After a week in the doldrums, investors showed some signs of life with rapid market swings of 1,000 points before closing down 128 points.  It was more than 700 points down at one point in the day, and even managed to make it to the positive at least once yesterday.  Analysts said that investors found many of the stocks tremendously undervalued and bought up the bargains.  That is the way free markets work, and there is no real reason to believe the markets will continue to slump all the way to election day.
 
Hanson says:

McCain must keep reminding in simple fashion that Freddie and Fannie were catalysts that drew in the Wall Street sharks: crooked officials cooked the books to get mega-bonuses; they got away with their crimes by lavishing money on mostly Democratic legislators (including Obama); and hand-in-glove they all covered — and still are covering — their tracks under a reprehensible politically correct cynicism.

 
As Americans, we have an unfortunate inability at times to focus on more than one thing at a time, and the economy has our attention at this particular moment.  If the economy turns around, and it has always has, we will have to find something else on which to focus our attention.  More importantly, the news media will have to find a more dramatic story to keep its consumers attention.
 
Iraq is no longer front page headline news as it was during the primary season when Democrats were falling all over themselves trying to outtalk each other on the "failed policies of the Bush Administration."  Remember all of the "I support the troops but not their mission" quotes from the contenders?  The tide has turned since the surge, elections have been held, the government has been instituted, and Iraq is almost ready to discard its water-wings and swim on its own.  al-Qaeda Iraq which was once 12,000 strong is now down to about 1200, and it is mostly contained in one location.  Hanson says, "The military is not broken, but now the most experienced, battle-hardened force in the world."  Rather than accept the defeat that Obama and the Democrats once touted, American forces - which won the war in a matter of days - is now winning the peace that is so much needed in the region.
 
The question of Obama's associations with too many questionable characters and organizations like ACORN, Ayers, Rezko, Wright, Pfleger, and Khalidi, leaves a bad taste in many peoples' mouths.  This is not guilt by association as his campaign would have you bellieve.  The heart of the matter is still character.  A person of good character would never associate with these types of people for extended periods of time.  Once knowing the background and ideologies of such bottom-feeders, most of us would break any such ties immediately.
 
Hanson says:
...the public tires of all the media slant, the celebrity rants, and the shills in popular culture, that in concert hourly berate, beg, threaten, and ridicule voters on behalf of Obama. We are supposed to accept Obama’s apotheosis, replete with Latinate seal, Greek columns, biblical injunctions about the seas and atmosphere, and prophesies that he is The One whom we have been waiting for. The creepy effect of ordering us to accept our own salvation becomes cumulative. So there is a quiet unease among the voters, as there always is in America, when someone finger-points and lectures them what they must do — or else!
 
We are already hearing complaints from the Obama camp that the McCain campaign has been using racist rhetoric to impugn their candidate.  Not once has this been demonstrated to be true.  McCain has actually been too kind to "my opponent," refusing to even call him by name until recently.  The Obamaniacs were so expecting to hear a comment in every speech that they could decry as racially tinged that they came to the game prepared with their own spin.  When it didn't happen, they just haven't been able to help using their prepared defenses anyway.
 
Senator McCain and Governor Palin received a wakeup call in Waukesha, WI the other day.  One man said he was mad as hell and that, as our representatives, McCain and Palin had better get mad, too.  The socialists are taking over our country step by step, he said, and we are not going to take it any more.  One lady was mad at the bailout and urged Senator McCain to name the names of, investigate and prosecute the guilty parties.  For the first time, he actually responded with the names of Dodd, Frank, and others at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  The crowd roared.
 
There are millions of us just like these two folks, and McCain-Palin need to make that connection.  We know John McCain and his record.  We do not necessarily like everything he has tried to do in his long Congressional career, but we do know him to be an honest and honorable man who loves his country.  In spite of more than two years of campaigning and two memoirs, we still don't have a good picture of just who Barack Obama is.  We see very little in the way of any significant accomplishments in his career.
 
Senator McCain can not control all of the events in the news, but he can certainly tell us with enthusiasm over and over that he is one of us, that he wants to help get Washington off of our backs, clean up the corruption in our Capitol, reduce our tax burden, and get Congressional spending under control.  And he can tell us that the United States Constitution is not just a suggestion for the way we operate our government; it is the Supreme Law of the land, and that his oath to preserve, protect, and defend it is more than an idle recitation of meaningless words.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive