About Me

Name: Bob Wood aka...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Obama Comments about Bankrupting Coal Industry (UPDATED)

Obama Called Out for Comments about Bankrupting Coal Industry

Quote:
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (WSAZ) -- With only hours before election day, coal has become a major topic of Decision 2008.

Sunday an audiotape surfaced from an interview Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama did with the San Francisco Chronicle in January.

In the interview, Obama talks about the importance of coal. He went on to talk about his cap and trade proposal to help curb global warming.

"If somebody wants to build a coal power plant they can, it's just that it will bankrupt them because they are going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted," Barack Obama said to the San Francisco Chronicle in January.
 


 
This would be bad news for Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia. And although he made those statements in January, they are just being reported now - two days before the election?

Where is the MSM? 

{Oh, yeah! In the tank!}

Quote:
The Obama campaign says the quote is being taken out of context and that Obama is actually from a coal state and is a strong supporter of the industry.

The campaign sent a statement today saying "the point Obama is making is that we need a transition from coal burning power plants built with old technology to plants built with advanced technologies."

Talk about trying to have it both ways! It's a wonder this campaign doesn't have a permanent case of whiplash!

But is he being quoted out of context? ABC's Jake Tapper has the answer:

Quote:
Here’s the entirety of Obama’s remarks:

“I voted against the Clear Skies Bill. In fact, I was the deciding vote -- despite the fact that I’m a coal state and that half my state thought that I had thoroughly betrayed them. Because I think clean air is critical and global warming is critical.

“But this notion of no coal, I think, is an illusion. Because the fact of the matter is, is that right now we are getting a lot of our energy from coal. And China is building a coal-powered plant once a week. So what we have to do then is figure out how can we use coal without emitting greenhouse gases and carbon. And how can we sequester that carbon and capture it. If we can’t, then we’re gonna still be working on alternatives.

“But ... let me sort of describe my overall policy. What I’ve said is that we would put a cap and trade policy in place that is as aggressive if not more aggressive than anyone out there. I was the first call for 100 percent auction on the cap and trade system. Which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases that was emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants are being built, they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted-down caps that are imposed every year.

“So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted. That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel, and other alternative energy approaches. The only thing that I’ve said with respect to coal -- I haven’t been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as an ideological matter, as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it, that I think is the right approach. The same with respect to nuclear. Right now, we don’t know how to store nuclear waste wisely and we don’t know how to deal with some of the safety issues that remain. And so it’s wildly expensive to pursue nuclear energy. But I tell you what, if we could figure out how to store it safely, then I think most of us would say that might be a pretty good deal.

“The point is, if we set rigorous standards for the allowable emissions, then we can allow the market to determine and technology and entrepreneurs to pursue, what the best approach is to take, as opposed to us saying at the outset, here are the winners that we’re picking and maybe we pick wrong and maybe we pick right.”

Yes. Obama plans to "fine" the "polluters" (power companies) heavily which will do two things:
    • Make electricity more expensive to everyone.
    • Increase the likelihood of "rolling brownouts."
Just remember, when you tax something, you get less of it. If you like the fact that the light comes on when you flip the switch, Obama is definitely not for you!  And he wants us all to be driving electric cars.  Just how does he think we are going to charge the batteries.

And he won't let us build nuclear power plants, and that is the safest, cleanest form of energy production available. The United States Navy has safely deployed nuclear-powered aircraft carriers - the biggest ships in the fleet - around the world for fifty years.  And now, the Navy is planning to build and deploy nuclear-powered destroyers and battleships because...  It does not make sense that the central ship in a battle group only needs refueling every 30 years, and the support ships are running on convential fuels that must be replenished much more often.  (But that is probably part of Barney Frank's 25% cut in the military budget.)

And there are people planning to vote for Obama? How much evidence of the harm he can do is necessary?
 
UPDATE:
Here's the video of the entire Obama statement:
 
 
I can only marvel at the smoothness with which this man can say nothing that makes any sense.
As always, I welcome your comments...
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Will Only Raise Taxes On Those Making ...

Obama Will Only Raise Taxes On Those Making
$250k, $200k, $150k, $120k, $70k, $60k, $50k, $40k
Ah, What the Hell? On Everyone!
 
Watch this before you vote!
 
 
 
 
It's about time the RNC went on the attack!
 
As usual, I welcome your comments and debate...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Sensible Campaign Platform

"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC
Balance the budget.  That should be easy.  Figure out what your income is, then prioritize your expenditures, subtract the expenditures from the income until you get to zero, and eliminate EVERYTHING that falls below zero.  We all learned how to do this in high school.  And if we didn't learn it there, we certainly learned it soon after setting up housekeeping on our own.  This is Dave Ramsey 101.
 
Public debt should be reduced.  That should be one of the priorities in balancing the budget.  I don't know about you, but my parents taught me that if you don't have the cash to pay for it, you don't need it!  That is true for governments as well.  We can not in good conscience continue to pile debt onto the backs of our children.
 
The Treasury should be refilled.  You and I have savings accounts, CD's, and long-term investments.  We call it "Saving for a rainy day."  Well, recent history shows that the federal government has rainy days too.  And when it has a rainy day, it's a doozy!  In fact, almost everything into which governemnt inserts itself results in the unintended consequence of a rainy day!
 
The arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled.  Our public officials have forgotten that they are elected by us - ordinary citizens - to serve us.  In their first official act, taking the oath of office, they pledge to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of The United States of America."  But judging from the legislation and court decisions they thrust upon us, it becomes painfully obvious that most of these folks have never read, much less understood, The Constitution.  Instead, they look forward to the next election as if they are entitled to hold the office instead of using the office to serve the people who put them there.
 
The assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome (the United States) become bankrupt.  We spend billions of dollars in foreign aid every year, sending it to countries that don't even like us very much.  In many cases, those American dollars never reach the people of those lands for their benefit, and instead those funds end up being embezzled by the corrupt leaders of those lands.  Our government has no mechanism for correcting this misspent "charity."  And now we have a presidential candidate who wants us to "give" 1% of our Gross Domestic Product to third-world countries and have it administered by the United Nations!  That is dumber than dumb!  Charity begins at home, and that means your home and my home, not the government.
 
People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.  Every year at Thanksgiving, Rush Limbaugh tells the story of The Mayflower Compact.  Most of us have forgotten that socialism was tried in this country before it WAS a country, and it failed miserably.  The people who lived under that Compact dumped it for a better way.  The New Deal and The Great Society have thrown hundreds of billions of dollars into government programs that have done nothing more than create another generation of the "dependent class" - those who would rather sit on their butts doing nothing until the government hands them a check (and I am not referring to those who paid Social Security and Medicare premiums for years.)  See this article "Cory the Well Driller’s Letter to Obama the Socialist" at The Texas Rainmaker.  We need more "Cory, The Well-Drillers," "Joe, The Plumbers," and anyone else who dares to start and operate the small businesses that provide the vast majority of the jobs in this country.  And we need the workers who will show up and work a full day for a day's pay.  And government needs to get out of the way and watch as the miracle of the Free Enterprise System that made this country great does its magic.
 
Cicero was right more than 2000 years ago.
 
Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Joe the Plumber and Robin Hood (Update)

(Update Below)
 
A lot has been said over the last few days about Joe the Plumber.  His real name is Joe Wurzelbacher from Toledo, Ohio.  He has become something of an instant celebrity because of this question to Sen. Barack Obama:
 
Obama sees nothing whatever wrong with taking Joe's hard-earned money - and the rest of us, as well - and giving it to someone else that he deems "less fortunate."  Well, why are they less fortunate?  Could it be that they have not made as wise choices as Joe, such as learning to do a job well, and getting up every day and going to work?  Could it be that the "less fortunate" squandered more than one opportunity at an education or an entry-level job to gain experience?  Could it be that the "less fortunate" are waiting for someone - even government - to put it in their hands for them? 
 
Joe obviously set some goals for himself and worked to attain them.  And now comes The Chosen One with a plan to take it away as soon as he has it within his grasp.  Neal Cavuto followed up for more of Joe's thoughts.
 
Wurzelbacher only made one misstatement to Cavuto.  Robin Hood did not steal from the "evil" rich to give to the poor.  Robin Hood stole from the evil Sheriff of Nottingham (the government) who had stolen his wealth from the poor citizens, and gave it back to the people who had originally earned it.
 
Robin Hood and Joe Wurzelbacher are my heroes.
 
Meanwhile, the Lamestream Media is probably trying to dig up dirt on Joe.  We would be much better served if the media spent half of that time and effort trying to dig up Barack Obama's history.  But we already know all we really need to know.  Obama himself said it:  "We need to spread (your) wealth around, and everybody benefits."  That is socialism, and we already have too much of that as it is.
 
UPDATE:  Well, this didn't take long.  Carrie Budoff Brown, Amie Parnes, Ben Smith, and Jonathon Martin of Politico busily got after the story, including information they got from the Associated Press, and now reports.  And what did they learn?
Wurzelbacher acknowledged to reporters that he doesn't have a plumber's license, but said he didn't need one because he works for someone else at a company that does residential work. State and local records show Wurzelbacher has no license, although his employer does.David Golis, manager and residential building official for the Toledo Division of Building Inspection, said Wurzelbacher still would need to be a licensed apprentice or journeyman to work in Toledo.

Wurzelbacher also owes the state of Ohio $1,182.98 in personal income tax, according to Lucas County Court of Common Pleas records. The Ohio Department of Taxation filed a claim on his property until he pays the debt, according to the records. The lien remains active.
And the McCain campaign says:
“It's an outrage that the Obama campaign and the media are attacking Joe the Plumber for asking a legitimate question of a presidential candidate. This is why voters still have so many questions about Barack Obama. Instead of answering tough questions, his campaign attacks average Americans for daring to look at the reality behind his words, said Tucker Bounds, spokesman the McCain-Palin campaign. “John McCain will continue to fight on behalf of all hardworking Americans like Joe for policies geared toward increasing prosperity and reducing the burden on taxpayers -- not 'spreading the wealth around' for Senator Government to distribute as he sees fit.”
If Politico can spare four writers in conjunction with the might of the AP, maybe they can look into another story that cries out for attention after two years.  Do you suppose they could just get after the Obama background mysteries with the same sense of "responsibility" they exhibited in trying to destroy the reputation of an everyday citizen in the name of partisan politics.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »